• English
    • Türkçe
  • English 
    • English
    • Türkçe
  • Login
View Item 
  •   DSpace Home
  • Akademik Arşiv / Institutional Repository
  • Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu / Vocational School of Health Services
  • Optisyenlik Programı / Opticianry Program
  • View Item
  •   DSpace Home
  • Akademik Arşiv / Institutional Repository
  • Sağlık Hizmetleri Meslek Yüksekokulu / Vocational School of Health Services
  • Optisyenlik Programı / Opticianry Program
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Dosimetric comparison of field-in-field and intensity-modulated radiotherapy techniques in bilateral breast cancer radiotherapy

Thumbnail
View/Open
Makale Dosyası (543.4Kb)
Date
2025
Author
Bilgiç, Erdi
Karakoç, Melike
Öğüt, Selim
Çoker, Eylem Gülce
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Aim: This study aims to compare the dosimetric parameters, treatment efficiency, and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing between field-in-field (FinF) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques in the treatment of bilateral breast cancer. Method: Radiotherapy treatment plans were developed for 10 patients diagnosed with bilateral breast cancer using both FinF and IMRT techniques. Dosimetric parameters, including Dmax, V47.5, V46, D2, D50, and D98 for target volumes, were evaluated. Conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) were also assessed. Additionally, OAR doses were compared to determine the advantages and disadvantages of each technique. All plans were evaluated in accordance with international standards and quality control protocols. Results: Both techniques achieved clinically acceptable dose distributions. FinF plans demonstrated lower OAR doses and were more advantageous in terms of treatment time, number of fields, and segment count. Conversely, IMRT plans provided superior dose homogeneity and target coverage. Although IMRT required longer planning and treatment times due to higher segment numbers, OAR doses remained within acceptable limits and were consistent with the literature. Conclusion: The FinF technique remains a viable and efficient option in bilateral breast cancer radiotherapy, particularly in reducing OAR doses and treatment duration. However, IMRT offers better conformity and dose homogeneity, making it preferable when precise dose distribution is prioritized. Selection of the appropriate technique should be patient-specific, balancing clinical priorities and resource availability.
 
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, bilateral meme kanseri tedavisinde kullanılan alan içinde alan (FinF) ve yoğunluk ayarlı radyoterapi (YART/IMRT) tekniklerinin dozimetrik parametreler, tedavi etkinliği ve risk altındaki organların (RAO) korunması açısından karşılaştırılmasıdır.
 
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12566/2414
Collections
  • Optisyenlik Programı / Opticianry Program

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 




sherpa/romeo


Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeABU AuthorWOSScopusPubMedTRDizinErişimThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsTypeABU AuthorWOSScopusPubMedTRDizinErişim

My Account

LoginRegister

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
Contact Us | Send Feedback
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


|| Library || Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi || OAI-PMH ||

Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Müdürlüğü, Antalya, Turkey
İçerikte herhangi bir hata görürseniz, lütfen bildiriniz: acikerisim@antalya.edu.tr

DSpace Repository:


DSpace 6.4-SNAPSHOT

Gemini Bilgi Teknolojileri A.Ş tarafından destek verilmektedir.