Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKapi, Yeşim
dc.contributor.authorÖziyci, Hatice Reyhan
dc.contributor.authorKarhan, Mustafa
dc.date.accessioned2025-10-22T11:12:28Z
dc.date.available2025-10-22T11:12:28Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationÖziyci, H. R., Kapi, Y., & Karhan, M. (2024). Phenolic acid profile alterations in aqueous and ethanolic stevia extracts across sequential purification stages. IKSAD Publishing House.en_US
dc.identifier.isbn978-625-367-901-9
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12566/2287
dc.description.abstractStevia extracts are valued for their health benefits, primarily due to the phenolic acids they contain, which contribute to the antioxidant properties of stevia. This study investigated the alterations in the phenolic acid composition of aqueous and ethanolic stevia extracts across several purification stages. Accordingly, dried stevia leaves were mixed with distilled water or ethanol, centrifuged, filtered, clarified at 50°C with aids, and then passed through stepwise membrane filtration using 30 kDa ultrafiltration and 5 kDa nanofiltration membranes. The phenolic acid composition was analyzed by extracting samples with a 75% methanol and formic acid solution, followed by centrifugation. Detection was performed using an LCMS/ MS device equipped with a C18 column. Chlorogenic acid was the most prevalent in both aqueous and ethanolic stevia extracts. However, the ethanolic extract exhibited a higher concentration (approx. 600 mg/kg) compared to the aqueous extract (approx. 100 mg/kg). After centrifugation and clarification, the phenolic acid concentrations in both extracts significantly decreased. The 30 kDa retentate phase was crucial for the enrichment of chlorogenic and caffeic acids. The aqueous extract reached approximately 120 mg/kg chlorogenic acid, while the ethanolic extract reached about 400 mg/kg. Nanofiltration phases (5 kDa permeate and retentate) significantly reduced the levels of these acids. Other phenolic acids, such as luteolin, apigenin, and rutin, remained at low levels throughout all phases. The solvent used had a significant impact on the phenolic profile, with ethanol being more effective in retaining chlorogenic acid. While the 30 kDa retentate phase concentrated phenolic acids, the type of solvent used played a key role in shaping the overall profile.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNo sponsoren_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherIKSAD Publishing Houseen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectStevia rebaudianaen_US
dc.subjectStevia rebaudianatr_TR
dc.subjectphenolic acidsen_US
dc.subjectfenolik asitlertr_TR
dc.subjectethanolicen_US
dc.subjectetanoliktr_TR
dc.subjectstepwise purificationen_US
dc.subjectkademeli saflaştırmatr_TR
dc.titlePHENOLIC ACID PROFILE ALTERATIONS IN AQUEOUS AND ETHANOLIC STEVIA EXTRACTS ACROSS SEQUENTIAL PURIFICATION STAGESen_US
dc.title.alternativeFARKLI SAFLAŞTIRMA AŞAMALARINA TABİ TUTULAN SULU VE ETANOLİK STEVİA EKSTRAKTLARININ FENOLİK ASİT PROFİLİNDEKİ DEĞİŞİMLERtr_TR
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/conferenceObjecten_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryInternational publicationen_US
dc.identifier.startpage225en_US
dc.identifier.endpage226en_US
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7750-3931 [Öziyci, Hatice Reyhan]
dc.contributor.abuauthorÖziyci, Hatice Reyhan
dc.contributor.yokid127772 [Öziyci, Hatice Reyhan]


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record