• English
    • Türkçe
  • Türkçe 
    • English
    • Türkçe
  • Giriş
Öğe Göster 
  •   E-arşiv Ana Sayfası
  • Akademik Arşiv / Institutional Repository
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi / Faculty of Health Sciences
  • Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü / Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
  • Öğe Göster
  •   E-arşiv Ana Sayfası
  • Akademik Arşiv / Institutional Repository
  • Sağlık Bilimleri Fakültesi / Faculty of Health Sciences
  • Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü / Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation
  • Öğe Göster
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Is it necessary to use a sling or abduction pillow sling after superior rotator cuff repair? A preliminary report

Thumbnail
Göster/Aç
Is it necessary to use a sling or abduction pillow sling after superior.pdf (471.4Kb)
Tarih
2024
Yazar
Pepe, İsmail Murad
Şahbat, Yavuz
Çalışal, Emre
Yılmaz, Selçuk
Topcuğlu, İsmet Aslı
Aracı, Ayça
Erdoğanoğlu, Yıldız
Üst veri
Tüm öğe kaydını göster
Özet
Objectives The study aimed to evaluate the effects of the use of a shoulder sling, shoulder sling with a pillow, or not using a sling on the shoulder functional score and pain levels following arthroscopic rotator cuff tear repair. Patients and methods This randomized prospective study was performed with 90 patients (49 males, 41 females; mean age: 56.2±12.2 year; range, 33 to 77 years) with a small-to-mid, full-thickness rotator cuff tear between July 2020 and October 2022. All patients underwent arthroscopic double-row repair. The nonsling group wore no sling, the sling group wore a sling, and the abduction pillow sling group wore a sling with an abduction pillow. The same rehabilitation program was performed. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Constant-Murley scores, and degrees of flexion and abduction were recorded preoperatively, on the 15th and 45th days, and at three months, six months, and one year. Results On the 15th postoperative day, the VAS score was found to be significantly lower in the nonsling group. On the 45th day, the Constant-Murley score was found to be significantly higher in the abduction pillow sling group. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding the Constant-Murley scores at three weeks, six months, and one year. The shoulder forward flexion angle was significantly lower in the nonsling group on the 45th day. There was no significant difference between the three groups in respect of the shoulder forward flexion at three months, six months, and one year. Conclusion No difference was determined between the groups at the six-month and one-year functional results. Not using a sling bandage can be recommended by reducing pain in the early postoperative period.
Bağlantı
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12566/2253
Koleksiyonlar
  • Fizyoterapi ve Rehabilitasyon Bölümü / Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 




sherpa/romeo


Göz at

Tüm E-arşivBölümler & KoleksiyonlarTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreABU Yazarına GöreWOSScopusPubMedTRDizinErişimBu KoleksiyonTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreABU Yazarına GöreWOSScopusPubMedTRDizinErişim

Hesabım

GirişKayıt

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


|| Kütüphane || Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi || OAI-PMH ||

Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Müdürlüğü, Antalya, Turkey
İçerikte herhangi bir hata görürseniz, lütfen bildiriniz: acikerisim@antalya.edu.tr

E-arşiv@AntalyaBilim:


DSpace 6.4-SNAPSHOT

Gemini Bilgi Teknolojileri A.Ş tarafından destek verilmektedir.