Periodontoloji / Periodontology
Permanent URI for this collectionhttps://acikerisim.antalya.edu.tr/handle/20.500.12566/411
Browse
6 results
Search Results
Item Endodontik ve periodontal tedavide bitkisel ürünlerin kullanımı(Livre De Lyon, 2021) Yanık, Deniz; Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert; Yanık, Deniz; Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert; Bakır, Elif Pınar; 0000-0001-5676-0293 [Yanık, Deniz]; 0000-0002-0505-867X [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]; 224169 [Yanık, Deniz]; 87286 [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]Hastalıkların tedavisindeki çözümsüzlükler ya da insanların sadece doğal olduğunu düşündükleri tedavi şekillerine inanmaları hem hekimlerin hem de hastaların alternatif tedavi arayışlarını arttırmaktadır. Doğal ve güvenilir olarak düşünülen bitkisel tedavi yöntemleri halk arasında eski çağlardan beri hastalıkların tedavisinde ve hastalıklardan korunmada kullanılmaktadır. Dünya Sağlık Örgütü (DSÖ) tıbbi bitki kullanımının artışını; gelişmekte olan ülkelerde ekonomik sebeplerle gelişmiş ülkelerin ürettiği ilaçlara bağımlılığı azalması ve ülkelerin kendi kültürlerini, doğal ve geleneksel kaynaklarını kullanmaları açısından önemli görmektedir.Item Birinci ve ikinci maksiller molar dişlerdeki bukkal kemik kalınlığının değerlendirilmesi: konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi çalışması(6. Uluslararası Hipokrat Tıp ve Sağlık Bilimleri Kongresi, 2021) Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert; Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert; 0000-0002-0505-867X [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]; 287286 [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]Objective: Facial alveolar bone (FAB) thickness has crucial clinical importance due to its effect on periodontal surgery, immediate implant placement. The purpose of the present study is to investigate facial alveolar bone thickness of maxillary first and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and method: Sixty-eight CBCT images belong to non-smoking healthy patients were retrospectively scanned and 84 three-rooted maxillary molars were selected. Endodontic treatment, post-core restoration, furcation and periapical lesion, root resorption, periodontal loss and previous orthodontic treatment were excluded from the study. FAB thicknesses of mesial and distal roots were measured at bone crest, 6 mm from bone crest and apical level of the root. Images were viewed on coronal, axial and sagittal plane in CBCT. The statistical analysis was performed. Results: FAB thicknesses of mesial and distal roots of first molar were 0,58 and 0,75 mm at bone crest and 0,39 and 0,96 mm at 6 mm from bone crest and 1,06 and 1,18 mm at apical, respectively. For second molar, 0,80 and 1,15 mm at bone crest and 1,52 and 1,48 mm at 6 mm from bone crest and 2,81 and 2,09 mm at apical, respectively. There is a statistically significant difference between the mesial root of the first and second molar at the bone crest, 6 mm from the bone crest, and apical of the root. For the distal root, there is a significant difference between the first and second molar at the bone crest and 6 mm from the bone crest. There is no significant difference at the apical of the root. Conclusion: The present study concluded that FAB thickness of the distal root of the fist molar is lower than the second molar. It is recommended the detailed examination of FAB thickness of the first molar when implant or periodontal surgery is needed.Item Maksiller birinci molar dişlerde denestrasyon ve dehisensin değerlendirilmesi(1. Uluslararası Tıp ve Sağlık Bilimleri Kongresi, 2021) Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert; Yanık, Deniz; Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert; Yanık, Deniz; 0000-0002-0505-867X [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]; 0000-0001-5676-0293 [Yanık, Deniz]; 287286 [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]; 224169 [Yanık, Deniz]The presence of fenestration and dehiscence has clinical importance for periodontal surgery, orthodontic treatment, and implant planning. The aim of the present study was to investigate the dehiscence and fenestration in maxillary first molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). For the study, 68 CBCT images obtained from the university clinic were retrospectively scanned and 96 maxillary first molars were selected. CBCT images were taken from Orthophos (Sirona Dental Systems, Bensheim, Germany). Teeth with caries, endodontic treatment, post-core restoration, periodontal destruction, internal or external resorption were excluded from the study. To detect fenestrations and dehiscence, CBCT images were analyzed on the coronal, axial, and sagittal plane in CBCT at x5 magnification. Fenestration and dehiscence detected in twodimensional axial sections were confirmed by three-dimensional reconstructions. Statistical analysis was performed. The prevalence of fenestration in the mesial and distal root of the maxillary first molar was 26% and 9.4%, respectively. The prevalence of dehiscence in the mesial and distal root of the maxillary first molar was 10.41% and 6.25%, respectively. There is no statistical difference between males and females in the prevalence of fenestration and dehiscence (p>.05). In this study, it was found that the prevalence of fenestration and dehiscence was higher in mesial roots compared to distal roots. For periodontal or implant surgeries, maxillary molars should be more carefully evaluated by three-dimensional tomography especially in mesial roots that showed the fenestration rate was 26%. CBCT imaging was considered suitable for the evaluation of the presence of fenestration and dehiscence in maxillary molars.Item Yaşlı bireylerde periodontal durum(Akademisyen Yayınevi, 2021) Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert; Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert; 0000-0002-0505-867X [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]; 287286 [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]Item Evaluation of the bone thickness of mandibular molars using cone beam computed tomography(Journal of Dentistry Indonesia, 2021) Yanık, Deniz; Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert; 0000-0001-5676-0293 [Yanık, Deniz]; 0000-0002-0505-867X [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]; 224169 [Yanık, Deniz]; 287286 [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]Objective: To investigate buccal and lingual bone thicknesses and fenestration rate of mandibular first and second molars using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: A total of CBCT images of 41 patients were selected and overall 120 mandibular molars were investigated. The buccal and lingual alveolar bone widths were measured at apex of the roots. The prevalence of fenestration in mandibular molars was recorded. Statistical analyses were performed. Results: The buccal bone widths of mesial root of second molars were significantly lower than the lingual (p<0.05). The lingual bone widths of mesial and distal root of second molars were lower than the buccal (p<0.05). The lowest thickness of buccal and lingual bone was observed in mesial root of first molar and distal root of second molar. The prevalence of fenestration in mandibular first and second molars was 5% and 10%. Conclusion: The buccal bone widths were lower at the first molar than the second molar. All fenestrations in first molar were in buccal aspect, in second molar were in lingual aspect. Topographical proximity of the buccal side of first molar and the lingual side of second molar to bone plate create a risky region for endodontic treatment or spread of infection.Item Periodontal fenotip ve klinik önemi(Akademisyen Yayınevi, 2022) Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert; Bulut, Şule; Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert; Bulut, Şule; Kesim, Servet; 0000-0002-0505-867X [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]; 0000-0002-8808-0185 [Bulut, Şule]; 287286 [Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert]; 4242 [Bulut, Şule]Günümüzde, diş hekimliğinde estetik tedavilerin planlanmasında birçok faktörün değerlendirilmesi tedavi sonuçlarını büyük ölçüde etkilemektedir. Değerlen dirilmesi gereken bu faktörlerden en önemlileri dişleri çevreleyen sert ve yumuşak dokulardır (1). Periodontal fenotip, gingival biyotip, gingival morfoloji gibi literatürde yakın zamana kadar tam olarak tanımlanmayan bazı terminolojiler bulunmaktadır. Biyotip teriminin tanımı spesifik genotipe sahip organlar grubu olarak yapılırken, fenotip terimi, genetik özelliklere ek olarak çevresel faktörleri ve birbirlerine olan etki sonuçlarını dolayısıyla biyotip terimini de içine almaktadır (2). “Diş eti biyotipi” bukko-lingual olarak diş eti kalınlığını tanımlamak için kullanılırken, “periodontal fenotip”, “periodontal morfotip”, “diş eti morfotipi” ve “diş eti fenotipi” terimleri yalnızca diş eti kalınlığı ve keratinize doku genişliğindeki değişiklikleri değil aynı zamanda alveoler kemik morfotipleri, diş şekil ve formları gibi başkaca özellikleri de ifade etmektedir (1,3,4,5,6). Periodontal ve Peri-implant Hastalıklar ve Durumların Sınıflandırılması Dün ya Çalıştayında (2017) “periodontal fenotip” teriminin kullanılması ve benimsen mesi önerilmiştir (7). Bu tanımlamaya göre periodontal fenotip; diş eti kalınlığı, keratinize doku genişliği ve alveoler kemik kalınlığını içeren bir yapıdır.