Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSarı, Ramazan
dc.contributor.authorPekeriçli, Mehmet Koray
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T10:22:52Z
dc.date.available2020-05-07T10:22:52Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationSarı, R., & Pekeriçli, M. K. (2020). An investigation of comparison and evaluation of official BIM documents released in the USA UK and Turkey. Journal of Construction Engineering, Management Innovation, 3(1), 67-84.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2630-5771
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12566/474
dc.description.abstractArchitecture, engineering and construction (AEC) industry is in the midst of BIM transition across the world. In parallel, Turkish architecture and engineering firms are also experiencing such BIM transition. Regarding the sector wide change in the world; governments release standards, regulations and best practice guides to support not only the governmental institutions but also private sector firms on BIM transition. The United States of America (USA) and United Kingdom (UK) are two countries providing a continuous stream of official documents to support BIM transition with respect to the country perspectives, however; there are no such official documents released in Turkey yet. Therefore, current BIM practices executed in Turkey are in compliance with existing architectural and engineering practice documents in Turkey, which are dated and insufficient. This situation brings a question for the authors of this research that what kind of regulative shortcomings and deficiencies exist in BIM transition practices of Turkish architectural and engineering firms when compared with counterparts in USA and UK. The research question is tried to be answered by comparing and evaluating official BIM documents released in the USA and UK with Turkish architectural and engineering service specification document by using key BIM terms collected from best practice guides released in USA and UK. The selected key BIM terms are addressing potential legal issues in a BIM practice that in case of being not referenced, it is likely to be confront with claims and conflicts among project participants. The overall study has significant potentials on addressing not only common shortcomings of BIM implementation but also discovery of regulative gaps and challenging issues for the BIM implementation practices in Turkish AEC industry practitioners.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNo sponsoren_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherGolden Light Publishingen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccessen_US
dc.subjectBIM transition in Turkeyen_US
dc.subjectBIM protocolsen_US
dc.subjectOfficial BIM documentsen_US
dc.subjectBIM Implementation in Turkeyen_US
dc.subjectTürkiye'de BIM'in geçişitr_TR
dc.subjectBIM protokolleritr_TR
dc.subjectResmi BIM belgeleritr_TR
dc.subjectTürkiye'de BIM uygulamasıtr_TR
dc.titleAn investigation of comparison and evaluation of official BIM documents released in the USA, UK and Turkeyen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryInternational publicationen_US
dc.identifier.volume3
dc.identifier.issue1
dc.identifier.startpage67
dc.identifier.endpage84
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8936-5716 [Sarı, Ramazan]
dc.contributor.abuauthorSarı, Ramazan
dc.contributor.yokid258048 [Sarı, Ramazan]
dc.identifier.TRDizinAvailableen_US
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.31462/jcemi.2020.01067084


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record