Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBüyükçavuş, Muhammed Hilmi
dc.contributor.authorKale, Burak
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-05T12:36:03Z
dc.date.available2022-04-05T12:36:03Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBüyükçavuş, M. H. & Kale, B. (2021). Effects of different types of maxillary protraction on maxilla with finite element analysis. Journal Of Pakistan Medical Association, 71(3), 877-882.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0030-9982
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12566/1101
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare two different skeletal anchorage methods with finite element analysis in the treatment of Class III patients with maxillary retrognathia. Material and Methods: Two different treatment scenarios were performed on skull model obtained from computerized tomography images of skeletal Class III patients with maxillary retrognathia and finite element analysis was performed. In the first group; mini plates were simulated on infra zygomatic crest. A unilateral 500 g protraction force was applied to the face-mask. In the second group; mini plates were simulated in infrazygomatic crest and mandibular symphysis. Then, 500g protraction force was applied with Class III elastic between the miniplates. Von Misses stresses and displacement values were evaluated comparatively. Results: In Class III elastic group, maximum Von Misses stress occurred around infra zygomatic crest and symphysis anchored with 0.078 MPa. The maxillary posterior region and paranasal regions were the areas showing the highest Von Misses tension after infra zygomatic crest and symphysis. In the face-mask group, the most common site of Von Misses stress in nasomaxillary complex and alveolar structures were infra zygomatic area where plaques were applied, followed by pterygomaxillary suture. Tensile forces are reduced especially in these two areas by spreading to surrounding structures. Conclusion: In both methods, it was determined that the amount of force transmitted to circumaxillary sutures was sufficient to induce the formation of osteogenesis in these regions.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNo sponsoren_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherJournal Of Pakistan Medical Associationen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectSkeletal anchorageen_US
dc.subjectİskelet ankrajıtr_TR
dc.subjectClass III malocclusionen_US
dc.subjectFinite element analysisen_US
dc.subjectSonlu elemanlar analizitr_TR
dc.titleEffects of different types of maxillary protraction on maxilla with finite element analysisen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryInternational publicationen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000651592500012
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85107321163
dc.identifier.volume71
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage877
dc.identifier.endpage882
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6828-8547 [Kale, Burak]
dc.contributor.abuauthorKale, Burak
dc.contributor.yokid192548 [Kale, Burak]
dc.identifier.PubMedID34057939
dc.identifier.doi10.47391/JPMA.1087


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record