Basit öğe kaydını göster

dc.contributor.authorBüyükçavuş, Muhammed Hilmi
dc.contributor.authorKale, Burak
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-01T08:08:59Z
dc.date.available2022-04-01T08:08:59Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationBüyükçavuş, M. H. & Kale, B. (2021). Skeletal and dental effects of twin-block appliances in patients treated with or without expansion. Turkish Journal of Orthodontics, 34(3), 155-162.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2148-9505
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12566/1087
dc.description.abstractObjective: To compare the skeletal and dental effects of twin-block appliances with or without expansion. Methods: From our archives, patients using twin-block appliances were selected. A total of 20 patients with expansion screws were classified as group 1 (10 male, 10 female; mean age 12.48 ± 1.38 years), and 18 patients without screws as group 2 (8 male, 10 female; mean age 12.81 ± 1.16 years). Cephalometric radiographs at pre-and post-treatment were used to evaluate skeletal and dentoalveolar parametric changes; study models and posteroanterior radiographs were used for transverse evaluation. The initial measurements and the treatment-related mean changes within the study groups were analyzed using the Student’s t-test. Results: Changes in maxillary skeletal measurements were not statistically significantly different between groups except for A-VRL (P > .05). Mandibular measurements showed an increase in SNB (º) and Co-Gn distance in both groups. However, these changes were similar for both groups (P > .05). The maxillary measurements showed that incisors were proclined in the expansion group and retroclined in the non-expansion group. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of changes in the skeletal transversal measurements (P > .05). On the study models, the changes in maxillary intercanine and intermolar widths, and in arch length differed to a statistically significant degree between groups (P < .05). Conclusion: The skeletal effects of 2 different types of twin-block appliances in the transversal direction were similar; it was deter mined that dental expansion was obtained in the maxilla by adding screws to the twin-block appliances.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNo sponsoren_US
dc.publisherTurkish Journal of Orthodonticsen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.subjectTwin-blocken_US
dc.subjectİkiz bloktr_TR
dc.subjectExpansionen_US
dc.subjectGenişlemetr_TR
dc.subjectPosteroanterioren_US
dc.subjectCephalometricsen_US
dc.titleSkeletal and dental effects of twin-block appliances in patients treated with or without expansionen_US
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleen_US
dc.relation.publicationcategoryInternational publicationen_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000698610900002
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85120811281
dc.identifier.volume34
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.startpage155
dc.identifier.endpage162
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6828-8547 [Kale, Burak]
dc.contributor.abuauthorKale, Burak
dc.contributor.yokid192548 [Kale, Burak]
dc.contributor.ScopusAuthorID56644375200 [Kale, Burak]
dc.identifier.PubMedID35110185
dc.identifier.doi10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2021.20103


Bu öğenin dosyaları:

Thumbnail

Bu öğe aşağıdaki koleksiyon(lar)da görünmektedir.

Basit öğe kaydını göster