• English
    • Türkçe
  • Türkçe 
    • English
    • Türkçe
  • Giriş
Öğe Göster 
  •   E-arşiv Ana Sayfası
  • Akademik Arşiv / Institutional Repository
  • Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi / Faculty of Dentistry
  • Endodonti / Endodontics
  • Öğe Göster
  •   E-arşiv Ana Sayfası
  • Akademik Arşiv / Institutional Repository
  • Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi / Faculty of Dentistry
  • Endodonti / Endodontics
  • Öğe Göster
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Dentin thickness at danger zone and canal morphology of maxillary molars

Thumbnail
Göster/Aç
Dentin thickness at danger zone and canal morphology of maxillary molars (1.064Mb)
Tarih
2022
Yazar
Yanık, Deniz
Nalbantoğlu, Ahmet Mert
Üst veri
Tüm öğe kaydını göster
Özet
Objectives: Dentin thickness in concave areas of the root creates risk for complications such as strip perforation during endodontic treatment. The study aims to examine dentin thickness of the danger (DZ) and safety zone (SZ), canal configuration, and the presence of isthmus in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars. Material and methods: Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) images of 1251 teeth belonging to 642 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The dentin thicknesses at DZ and SZ in maxillary molars with one (MB) or two mesiobuccal canals (MB1, MB2) were measured at the 3 mm apical to the furcation level. Vertucci’s canal configurations and the isthmus rate were recorded. The Chi-square test andThe Student’s t-test were performed. Results: MB2 rate was higher in maxillary first molars (61.68%) than second molars (39.36%). Isthmus rates were 27.3% and 44.11% in first and second molars. DZ thickness was thinner than the dentin thickness in the SZ in both first and second molars with one or two mesial canals (p< 0.05). In teeth with single canal, the mean DZ thickness was 0.88mm. In teeth with two canals, the mean DZ thicknesses were 0.83mm and 0.80mm for MB1 and MB2 canals, respectively. Conclusion: MB2 rate was higher in the first molar (61.68%), and the isthmus rate was higher in the second molar (44.11%). DZ and SZ were thinner in MB2 than in MB1 at the maxillary molars with two mesial canals. The results indicated that more conservative preparation must be applied to the MB2 canal in the maxillary molars.
Bağlantı
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12566/1145
Koleksiyonlar
  • Endodonti / Endodontics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 




sherpa/romeo


Göz at

Tüm E-arşivBölümler & KoleksiyonlarTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreABU Yazarına GöreWOSScopusPubMedTRDizinErişimBu KoleksiyonTarihe GöreYazara GöreBaşlığa GöreKonuya GöreTüre GöreABU Yazarına GöreWOSScopusPubMedTRDizinErişim

Hesabım

GirişKayıt

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2016  DuraSpace
İletişim | Geri Bildirim
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 


|| Kütüphane || Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi || OAI-PMH ||

Antalya Bilim Üniversitesi Kütüphane ve Dokümantasyon Müdürlüğü, Antalya, Turkey
İçerikte herhangi bir hata görürseniz, lütfen bildiriniz: acikerisim@antalya.edu.tr

E-arşiv@AntalyaBilim:


DSpace 6.4-SNAPSHOT

Gemini Bilgi Teknolojileri A.Ş tarafından destek verilmektedir.